Re: MIT License?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, mikael.johansson@wineasy.se
Subject: Re: MIT License?
From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
Date: 29 Aug 2000 15:52:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] xnod7ismaxf.fsf@ve.diku.dk>
In-reply-to: "Christian T. Steigies"'s message of "Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:42:35 +0200"
References: <[🔎] 20000829154235.A3697@ap031.experimentalphysik.uni-kiel.de>

"Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org> writes:

> Licenses? 
>      I release this software under the MIT license. (No, not the GPL
>      license. Mainly because I do not quite understand the GPL license
>      myself as I do with the MIT and the BSD types.)

For the almost the exact same reason I would never release software
licensed the GPL way if I wasn't forced to do it. The MIT license is
completly free and Debian has no problems with software licensed this
way.

Please don't change this kind of licenses. 

-- 
Peter

Reply to:

References:
- MIT License?
  - From: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>

Prev by Date: MIT License?
Next by Date: Re: MIT License?
Previous by thread: MIT License?
Next by thread: Re: MIT License?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread