[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNU License and Computer Break Ins



At the risk of seeming to pick nits, this is not actually the effect of
the GPL.  The author of a GPL work can license it to different parties on
different terms; only authors of derivative works are so encumbered.  The
author of a GPL work could even sell it, or add conditions of sale, such
as allowing people to purchase technical support only if they also
purchased the program.  The author of a GPL could even make two completely
different versions such as a free version and a pay version; nothing in
the GPL prohibits crippleware by an original author.

-- Mike



On 2000-05-19 at 22:27 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:

> However, the GPL tries to make sure that -- once copies of GPLed software
> are distributed -- the recipients of the software have as many rights as
> any other recipients of any other versions of that software.  [That means
> no peculiar rules about how recipient c has to follow special procedures
> when modifying the version of the software received from recipient f,
> for instance.]




Reply to: