[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Was Re: KDE not in Debian?

On Jan 30, Andreas Pour wrote:
> > [Personally, I think if you wrote the software yourself and link it
> > against Qt, it's pretty obvious from a legal standpoint that you
> > accept people linking it against Qt.
> I think so too.  So why not just exclude kgv and kfloppy and distribute the
> rest?

Because I'm not part of the Cabal (TINC).

Seriously, it's the contrast between a meritless lawsuit and no
lawsuit at all.  Meritless lawsuits are expensive; we'll get back to
you after we IPO.  Ask the css-auth victims...

(I guess I'm missing the reason why it's so hard to get people to
explicitly say "you can link this against Qt"; that apparently would
satisfy the FTP maintainers and let KDE 1 into contrib [and KDE 2 into

|        Chris Lawrence        |          It's 2/3 of a beltway...          |
|   <quango@watervalley.net>   |       http://www.lordsutch.com/tn385/      |
|                              |                                            |
|     Open Directory Editor    |   Visit the Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5:   |
|       http://dmoz.org/       |   <*> http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/ <*>   |

Reply to: