Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]

To: Chris Lawrence <quango@watervalley.net>
Cc: Debian legal list <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: 28 May 1999 22:40:26 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r9o0fsr9.fsf@hasler.dhh>
In-reply-to: Chris Lawrence's message of "Fri, 28 May 1999 21:54:37 -0500"
References: <[🔎] 199905280040.KAA21986@kestrel.ke.com.au> <[🔎] 19990527231029.A2328@debian.org> <[🔎] 199905280624.QAA26893@kestrel.ke.com.au> <[🔎] 19990528014104.A18460@localhost.watervalley.net> <[🔎] 19990528082739.D10319@darren.benham.net> <[🔎] 19990528215437.D21917@localhost.watervalley.net>

Chris Lawrence writes:
> Is the LGPL (AbiWord uses glib internally) Qt-compatible?

The LGPL is everything compatible.  That is its purpose.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
  - From: "Andrew Wansink" <awansink@ke.com.au>
- Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
  - From: "Andrew Wansink" <awansink@ke.com.au>
- Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
  - From: Chris Lawrence <quango@watervalley.net>
- Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
  - From: "Darren O. Benham" <gecko@debian.org>
- Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
  - From: Chris Lawrence <quango@watervalley.net>

Prev by Date: Re: IBM PUBLIC LICENSE - OpenSource?
Next by Date: Re: (Fwd) Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiw
Previous by thread: Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
Next by thread: Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread