Re: IBM PUBLIC LICENSE - OpenSource?

[John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>]

I wrotes:
> Much closer to GPL than BSD, IMHO.  You can distribute binaries under your
> license, but you must make source available under the IBM license.

Joseph Carter writes:
> You just described the BSD license...

The BSD license (less warrantee disclaimer):

  Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
  modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
  are met:
  1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
  2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
     documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
  3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
     must display the following acknowledgement:
          This product includes software developed by the University of
          California, Berkeley and its contributors.
  4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
     may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
     without specific prior written permission.

Where does it say that source must be made available?
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI