Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Henning Makholm writes:
> Caspian <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I'd just like to state that if anyone out there is interested in making a
> > completely, utterly free software GNU/Linux dist, with a license that
> > prohibits putzen like those at Corel from pulling the sort of nonsense
> > they've been pulling,
> Note that you won't be able to include any GPLed software in your
> distribution if you want to make restrictions about how and when
> other people or corporations are allowed to redistribute it.
Where does the GPL say that? I can give you several examples of distributors
who have made this their regular practice.
Seth David Schoen <email@example.com> | And do not say, I will study when I
Temp. http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/ | have leisure; for perhaps you will
down: http://www.loyalty.org/ (CAF) | not have leisure. -- Pirke Avot 2:5