Re: Open Content Licence is non-free?
From: Richard Braakman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> The first part only allows distribution for money if it's "for use offline".
> This forbids distribution for money over a network. Either makes
> it non-free.
I think this is just like the Artistic license restriction - notice the word
"sole". It means that you can charge for more than one file, but not for this
file exclusively. I think it's sloppy, but I don't think it takes the license
out of DFSG compliance.