On Sun, Oct 31, 1999 at 10:53:31AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > > Given the choice between making the GPL a non-free license and having a > > way to potentially do something bad with a GPLed program, I would say it's > > better to leave things as they are. > > It's a false dichotomy. I think we could keep it a free license and close this > loophole too. Please keep trying then--but the discussion is headed the wrong way right now. -- - Joseph Carter GnuPG public key: 1024D/DCF9DAB3, 2048g/3F9C2A43 - knghtbrd@debian.org 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- * o-o always like debmake because he knew exactly what it would do... <ibid> o-o: you would ;-)
Attachment:
pgp_NJCknXRcK.pgp
Description: PGP signature