debian-legal Oct 1999 by thread

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: NcFTP is free again? Chris Lawrence

Re: NcFTP is free again? Mike Gleason

Re: NcFTP is free again? Marcus Brinkmann
Re: NcFTP is free again? Peter S Galbraith
Re: NcFTP is free again? Samuel Hocevar

Re: NcFTP is free again? Joseph Carter

Re: SSH never free Ben Pfaff

Re: SSH never free Richard Stallman

Re: SSH never free Brian Ristuccia

Re: SSH never free Seth David Schoen

Re: SSH never free Wichert Akkerman

Re: SSH never free Seth David Schoen
Re: SSH never free Brian Ristuccia

Re: SSH never free Henning Makholm

Re: SSH never free Raul Miller

Re: SSH never free Henning Makholm
Re: SSH never free Raul Miller
Re: SSH never free Richard Stallman

Re: SSH never free Richard Stallman

Re: SSH never free Wichert Akkerman
Re: SSH never free Richard Stallman
Re: SSH never free Henning Makholm
Re: SSH never free Richard Stallman

Re: web site license Adam Di Carlo
license question Joey Hess

Re: license question Chris Lawrence
Re: license question Brian Ristuccia

Re: license question Joey Hess

Message not available
Re: license question Joey Hess
Re: license question Marcus Brinkmann
Re: license question Raul Miller
Re: license question Henning Makholm
Re: license question Remco Blaakmeer

ocaml license Sven LUTHER

Re: ocaml license David Starner

Re: ocaml license Sven LUTHER

Re: ocaml license David Starner

opencontent licence DFSG free? Joey Hess

Re: opencontent licence DFSG free? Chris Lawrence

Re: opencontent licence DFSG free? Jens Ritter

Re: opencontent licence DFSG free? Chris Lawrence

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: opencontent licence DFSG free? bruce

[bf347@lafn.org (David Lawyer)] Re: Draft Bolierplate License Adam Di Carlo

Re: [bf347@lafn.org (David Lawyer)] Re: Draft Bolierplate License Henning Makholm

Re: [bf347@lafn.org (David Lawyer)] Re: Draft Bolierplate License J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)

GPL Question Matthew Simpson

Re: GPL Question William T Wilson

Corel's apt frontend Branden Robinson

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Corel's apt frontend Branden Robinson

Re: Corel's apt frontend Jason Gunthorpe

Re: Corel's apt frontend Gergely Madarasz
Re: Corel's apt frontend Branden Robinson
Re: Corel's apt frontend Joey Hess

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Brian Ristuccia

Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens
Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Gergely Madarasz

Re: Corel's apt frontend Jason Gunthorpe

Re: Corel's apt frontend Brian Ristuccia

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens
Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Ian Jackson

Re: Corel's apt frontend David Starner
Re: Corel's apt frontend Henning Makholm
Re: Corel's apt frontend David Starner
Re: Corel's apt frontend Henning Makholm
Re: Corel's apt frontend Ian Jackson
Re: Corel's apt frontend David Starner
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Richard Stallman
Re: Corel's apt frontend David Starner
Re: Corel's apt frontend Richard Stallman
Re: Corel's apt frontend Peter Makholm
Re: Corel's apt frontend Henning Makholm
Re: Corel's apt frontend Ian Jackson
Re: Corel's apt frontend Henning Makholm
Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Henning Makholm
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens
Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens
Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Anthony Towns
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend David Starner
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend David Starner
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Anthony Towns
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Anthony Towns
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Anthony Towns
Re: Corel's apt frontend Jeff Teunissen

Re: Corel's apt frontend Chris Lawrence

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Marcus Brinkmann

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Brian Ristuccia
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens
Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Henning Makholm

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Joseph Carter
Re: Corel's apt frontend Anthony Towns

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Brian Ristuccia
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller
Re: Corel's apt frontend Anthony Towns
Re: Corel's apt frontend David Starner
Re: Corel's apt frontend Raul Miller

Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens
Re: Corel's apt frontend Bruce Perens

apt and corel Bruce J. Perens
[harik@chaos.ao.net: Bug#47735: VIM includes encryption. Needs to become a non-US package.] Wichert Akkerman

Re: [harik@chaos.ao.net: Bug#47735: VIM includes encryption. Needs to become a non-US package.] Wichert Akkerman
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [harik@chaos.ao.net: Bug#47735: VIM includes encryption. Needs to become a non-US package.] Bruce Perens

Re: [harik@chaos.ao.net: Bug#47735: VIM includes encryption. Needs to become a non-US package.] Wichert Akkerman

Re: [harik@chaos.ao.net: Bug#47735: VIM includes encryption. Needs to become a non-US package.] Brian Ristuccia

Re: [harik@chaos.ao.net: Bug#47735: VIM includes encryption. Needs to become a non-US package.] Bruce Perens

Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree? Brian Ristuccia

Re: Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree? Chris Lawrence

Re: Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree? Brian Ristuccia

Re: Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree? Chris Lawrence
Re: Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree? Chip Salzenberg
Re: Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree? Raul Miller

Bruce's DSL down Bruce J. Perens
Re: Bug#47438: copyright statement needs updating? Brock Rozen

Re: Bug#47438: copyright statement needs updating? Peter Makholm

Re: Bug#47438: copyright statement needs updating? Brock Rozen

Is the GPL free? Cesar Eduardo Barros

Re: Is the GPL free? David Starner

Re: Is the GPL free? Cesar Eduardo Barros
Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Re: Is the GPL free? William T Wilson
Re: Is the GPL free? Darren O. Benham

Re: Is the GPL free? Joey Hess

Re: Is the GPL free? Bernd Eckenfels
Re: Is the GPL free? Joseph Carter

Re: Is the GPL free? Joey Hess

Re: Is the GPL free? Joseph Carter

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Is the GPL free? Bruce Perens

proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright Branden Robinson

Re: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright Zygo Blaxell

Re: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright Henning Makholm

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright Bruce Perens
Re: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright Bruce Perens

Re: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright Branden Robinson

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Bruce Perens

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Anthony Towns

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) David Starner

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Joey Hess
Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Raul Miller

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Joey Hess

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Joey Hess
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Bruce Perens
Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Bruce Perens

Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?) Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Wine+GPL license? Oskar Liljeblad
Re: ITP: ibm-jdk1.1-installer Matthias Klose
French Senators propose Open Source for all Government Software Bruce Perens
non-free, LZW, RSA, and mp3 Brian Ristuccia

Re: non-free, LZW, RSA, and mp3 Jens Ritter

Re: non-free, LZW, RSA, and mp3 Brian Ristuccia

Re: non-free, LZW, RSA, and mp3 Seth David Schoen

SNNS: does it really belong into non-free? Siggy Brentrup
Why aXe is in non-free Uurcus the Swale
jdk1.1 license changes Stephen Zander

Re: jdk1.1 license changes Marcus Brinkmann

Re: jdk1.1 license changes Stephen Zander

The last update was on 10:12 GMT Sat May 11. There are 199 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc