Re: opencontent licence DFSG free?
On Oct 12, Joey Hess wrote:
> The whole O'Reilly debian book is online now at
> The copyright is the OpenContent license,
> It looks to me on a hurried reading that the opencontent license is DFSG
> free so long as none of the "license options" are invoked. Opinions?
I tend to agree; my recollection is that the OpenContent License (aka
OPL) was specifically designed to be compliant with the Open Source
Definition (and thus the DFSG). Furthermore, I think RMS helped them
write it or revise it.
| Chris Lawrence | Get Debian GNU/Linux CDROMs |
| <email@example.com> | http://www.lordsutch.com/cds/ |
| | |
| Debian Developer | Are you tired of politics as usual? |
| http://www.debian.org/ | http://www.lp.org/ |