Re: Bug#40937: omniorb: Freeness?
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 12:17:21 -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote:
> >Is the IDL compiler a separate part of the OmniORB and TAO packages, or
> >do they contain GPL-ed changes for it? (If it's the latter, I think it's
> >the same regrettable situation as KDE, i.e. not redistributable in binary
> I'm afraid that it is the case -- I hadn't thought it through before, but
> you are correct. What are our redistribution options in this case?
In that case, we have no options for redistribution in binary form that I'm
aware of. A source-only packaging is an option, but a more workable solution
would be to ask for a license change.
Cyberspace, a final frontier. These are the voyages of my messages,
on a lightspeed mission to explore strange new systems and to boldly go
where no data has gone before.