Re: Recently released QPL
> The Author who wants to put his changes under a very free license (assuming
> incompatible with GPL) thinks this is not a disservice to the Free Software
> community. But then, he does not colicense it under the GPL. Why? You don't
> give me a good reason for it ("they just don't want to" is no reason for
> me).
I have one possible solution. I've been thinking on how I could do that
with my code and I'm coming up blank. What would the wording be that will
let me license "foobar" under my own, prefered, license *AND* the GPL?
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <webmaster@debian.org> *
* <lintian-maint@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> *
=========================================================================
Reply to: