Re: UW gave permission for PINE
Paul Nathan Puri:
> Are you against the existence of the non-free directory?
No, I'm just against requiring "special permissions" to distribute things.
Stephane Bortzmeyer:
> I personnaly often asked for distribution clearances (almost all biology
> packages are non-free,
> #ifndef RMS
> if we want Debian to succeed in that field, non-free is an essential
> part of Debian
> #endif
> ).
#if defined(social contract)
non-free is not a part of Debian (not even essential).
@endif
Personally, I don't care whether or not Debian succeeds in that "field".
--
"aa1f072dd0678c1fac4dcb2db2212e79" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: