Re: Would this comply with DFSG?
Wichert Akkerman <email@example.com> writes:
> Previously James Troup wrote:
> > Oh, good, someone chuck vim in non-free, if it's license hasn't
> > changed then.
> Hey, hold on! It so happend I'm currently discussing the vim license
> with its author (Bram Moolenaar) at the moment, and I have good hopes of
> getting it fixed.
My original bug report on the subject was #14xxx era. How long do we
wait before chucking something in non-free? e.g. Should we still be
awaiting resolution on the GPL + Qt linked problem?