Re: IBM Jikes license

To: bruce@pixar.com, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, john@dhh.gt.org
Subject: Re: IBM Jikes license
From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 98 17:37 PST
Message-id: <[🔎] m0znC5I-000FmyC@golem.pixar.com>
Reply-to: Bruce Perens <bruce@pixar.com>
References: <[🔎] m0zn8kp-000EAUC@golem.pixar.com> <[🔎] 19981207173322.U6581@test.legi-slate.com>

> Perhaps Debian should have a patent policy document that is distinct from
> the DFSG.

Agreed. Or perhaps Debian folks should staff the LPF and the EFF, which
both need some new energy as far as I can tell. I met Barlow a while back,
he seems to have the right ideas, but not enough time/energy to work on
them.

	Thanks

	Bruce
--
The $70 Billion US "budget surplus" hardly offsets our $5 Trillion national
debt. The debt increased by $133 Billion in the same year we found a
"surplus".
Bruce Perens K6BP bruce@pixar.com 510-620-3502 NCI-1001

Reply to:

References:
- IBM Jikes license
  - From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens)
- Re: IBM Jikes license
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Prev by Date: draft 1.4 of DFSG
Next by Date: Re: Intent to package Jikes
Previous by thread: Re: IBM Jikes license
Next by thread: Re: IBM Jikes license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread