Re: QPL v.91
> It might be better not to use this phrase in a legal document. The law is
> likely to insist on interpreting "free" as "gratis".
Joseph Carter writes:
> So do s/free software/applications/ and call it good?
This license applies to any software containing a notice placed by the
copyright holder saying that it may be distributed under the terms of the
Q Public License version 0.91. Such software is herein referred to as the
Software. This license covers copying and distribution of the Software
and derivatives thereof.
The license doesn't say anything about 'use' or 'development' anyway, nor
does copyright law give it power to do so.
If I get time I may post a version of the document with some similar minor
clarifications. I hope TT is going to have this reviewed by a competent
copyright attorney before using it.
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
firstname.lastname@example.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.