[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dlink DWL-G650 with madwifi



Richard Mittendorfer said/sagte:
> yes - please post "# ifconfig" & "# route -n". looks like you have wrong
> routing settings. check /etc/network/interfaces.

dropkick:~# ifconfig
ath0      Protokoll:Ethernet  Hardware Adresse 00:80:C8:13:05:BE
          inet6 Adresse: fe80::280:c8ff:fe13:5be/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:31 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:31
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:199
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
          Interrupt:11 Speicher:d4e64000-d4e74000

eth0      Protokoll:Ethernet  Hardware Adresse 00:10:A4:86:8C:C2
          inet Adresse:192.168.1.102  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Maske:255.255.255.0
          inet6 Adresse: fe80::210:a4ff:fe86:8cc2/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:97 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:122 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000
          RX bytes:11433 (11.1 KiB)  TX bytes:13397 (13.0 KiB)

lo        Protokoll:Lokale Schleife
          inet Adresse:127.0.0.1  Maske:255.0.0.0
          inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:28 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:28 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0
          RX bytes:2168 (2.1 KiB)  TX bytes:2168 (2.1 KiB)


route -n shows only entries for eth0. After bringing eth0 down it's empty. (ahaaaa!)

An other source of problems could be that iwlist ath0 scan does shows my AP, however iwpriv ath0 mode 3 (or 0, tried both) gives this error "ath0 WE : Buffer for request SIOCGIWPRIV too small (16<59)" and another repetition of that this time with "(32<59)".

Regards,
Meike

-- 
Meike Reichle - University of Hildesheim

mail:	mrei0999@rz.uni-hildesheim.de
web:	www.uni-hildesheim.de/~mrei0999



Reply to: