Re: USB mouse not working in woody2.4
Hello Ben,
> but lsmod shows:
> usbmouse 1760 0 (unused)
> hid 18816 0 (unused)
> keybdev 1664 0 (unused)
> usbkbd 2848 0 (unused)
> input 3072 0 [usbmouse hid keybdev usbkbd]
> usb-uhci 20708 0 (unused)
> usbcore 48032 0 [usbmouse hid usbkbd usb-uhci]
I'm missing module "mousedev" here. And where do "usbmouse" and "usbkbd" come
from? Are you using basic keyboard and usbmouse
support (USB HIDBP (Keyboard|Mouse) (basic) support) in your kernel
configuration? The kernel docs warn against that ..
Maybe you should try:
<M> USB Human Interface Device (full HID) support
[*] HID input layer support
Check if you have also configured "Mouse support" under "Input core support".
Module load order seems to matter, on a Dell 81K it gets loaded in the
following order:
[snippet from /etc/modutils/actions:]
..
post-install usbcore insmod usb-uhci
post-install usb-uhci insmod input
post-install input insmod hid
post-install hid insmod mousedev
..
Don't forget update-modutils when changing files in /etc/modutils.
and that gives:
[lsmod output]
..
mousedev 3832 1
hid 12840 0 (unused)
input 3328 0 [mousedev hid]
usb-uhci 22092 0 (unused)
usbcore 57312 1 [hid usb-uhci]
..
Don't ask me why "hid" and "usb-uhci" appear as unused, unloading them
manually disables my USB mouse, so .. ;)
XFree86Config-4 snippet:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "USB Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Option "SendCoreEvents"
Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
Option "Name" "AutoDetected"
Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2"
Option "Vendor" "AutoDetected"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "true"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
EndSection
>I tried: /etc/init.d/gpm stop as suggested here:
>http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12780&highlight=debian+usb+mouse
>which returned:
>bash: /etc/init.d/gpm: no such file or directory
Looks like no gpm installed. ;)
Regards,
Frank
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Trenkamp ftrenkam at uos.de
PGP fprt: 5A0C 4AE9 74A5 51F0 2D34 E7DC 67FF 32C4 0357 5653
-------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: