On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 01:29:27PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote: > >Geez, no fvwm users yet? >(Not that I usually answer these polls) > >Of course, I have a setup I have been happy with for 6 years, so it was >only 6 months back that I decided to upgrade from fvwm1 to 2. Well, quite. I've got a fvwm setup that I've been tuning for ~10 years. I made the swap to fvwm2 about 5 years ago. In fact, checking... Yay! my m4-ified fvwm2rc is still in the package as an example. I should probably update that, as by now it probably won't work too well. Fvwm is cool. It takes a fair bit of configuration, but it's fast, small and absolutely bomb-proof in my experience. And several of the newer WMs still don't match its features... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/
Attachment:
pgpaJ9HoP_snY.pgp
Description: PGP signature