[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Installing Debian over Network with the e100-driver



Hanno Böck wrote:

I have a Sony PCG-GR114MK-Notebook. It has an Intel Network card and it
seems that it can only be installed with the intel e100-driver.
The e100-driver is only in the nonfree-part of debian and there only as a
source.

The card will probably work with the eepro driver (or eepro100). Afaik
all intel compatible cards work with that driver.


I would like to install debian on my laptop over network/dsl-connection.
Is there a possibility to load the e100-driver from the installer?
How can I install debian over network??

In the modules configuration select the eepro module and load it...


It does not.
It seems that there are some Intel-cards that do not work with the eepro/eepro100-driver.
If it helps, here is what lspci says about this card:
02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation: Unknown device 1031 (rev 41)
	Subsystem: Sony Corporation: Unknown device 80e7
	Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 9
	Memory at d0204000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
	I/O ports at 4000 [size=64]
	Capabilities: <available only to root>



Many of the newer mini-pci intel cards are supported by the e100 driver. The earlier eepro or eepro100 will not work. One other method would be to use a pcmcia card other than the e100 card (is that one integrated?), do the network installation, download the e100 sources, and switch things around a bit. I have a Dell Latitude Ls with an integrated 3com vortex card and I often slip in a 3com pcmcia card or a orinoco gold card instead. I have had very good luck with a variety of cheap ethernet cards as well as the non-cheap 3com's. One that has worked flawlessly is the linksys dual ethernet/modem combo card. It does not require the curse of the digital age -- the dongle :)


Would this method work for you?





--
Michael Perry | "Do or do not; there is no try" Master Yoda
mperry@lnxpowered.org | http://www.lnxpowered.org




Reply to: