[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Teles PCMCIA ISDN problem



Hi,

The card works under WinMe and the NT drivers are installed which came
together with the card. I mean I can log in and use Internet Explorer
at home connected to ISDN. 

I'm not sure where the problem lies under Linux. I suspect the
teles_cs module which was last modified before '99. I can remove the
card without removing the hisax driver from the kernel which seems
strange to me. The irq and io usable by the hisax module change random
if I remove and insert the hisax module again. So I don't know the
solution.

Gabor

	Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 19:06:30 +0200
	From: Martin Man <Martin.Man@seznam.cz>
	Resent-From: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org

	Hi,
		got some time ago Teles PnP, and tried to set this one up in Germany
	(deutche telco, euroISDN) - without success, card was detected properly but
	not able to dial neither under debian nor under windoze (local hangup), 
	buying cheap-sh*t fritz isdn card helped, try asking your telco if they have
	problems with teles in general....


	hope this helps :)
	martin

	On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 03:42:35PM +0200, Gabor Zoltan Csejtey wrote:
	> HI,
	> 
	> Anyone using Teles PCMCIA ISDN card???
	> 
	> 
	> I managed to install the hisax module using slightly different io address:
	> modprobe hisax type=8 io=0x301 irq=11 protocol=2
	> 
	> but the card doesn't work yet.
	> 
	> After starting the isdnutils and trying the to dial I get a local
	> hangup after 8 seconds. It doesn't matter if the cable is connected to
	> the ISDN adaptor or not.
	> 
	> I can ramove the crad without an effect to the hisax module using
	> cardctl eject. I suspect the teles_cs module from the pcmcia package
	> cause the problem.
	> 
	> Gabor
	> 

	-- 
	-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	"Only dead fish swims with a stream"
	gpg_key_available: http://globales.cz/~mman/martin.man.gpg
	gpg_key_fingerprint: 2CC0 4AF6 92DA 5CBF 5F09  7BCB 6202 7024 6E06 0223



Reply to: