[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Recognizing Kernel Update to 2.4.12



you need to unpack linux-2.4.12.tar.gz first. Use tar zxvf
linux-2.4.12.tar.gz (better copy linux-2.4.12.tar.gz to /usr/local/src and
then unpack it there). Then cd to the directory created and then do
make-kpkg there. But you have to do make xconfig or make menuconfig there
first). Please follow directions given in the installation guide for Debian
2.2 for custom kernel compilation. The directions are detailed and more than
helpful to make your own kernel

renchi


On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:11:58PM -0500, eDoc wrote:
> > you need to, as in the documentation, run make-kpkg from the top-level
> kernel
> > directory, which will depend on where you put your kernel source. This is
> typically
> > either /usr/src/linux or /usr/src/kernel-source-<kernelversion>
> > glen
> 
> kernel-source?  You mean "linux-2.4.12.tar.gz?
> 
> Or do you mean "linux-2.4.12.gz"?
> 
> "linux-2.4.12.tar.gz" is in /usr/src and I tried to run "make-kpkg" there.
> No go.
> 
> Neither "linux-2.4.12.gz" or "kernel-source-2.4.12" exist according to
> "find -name linux-2.4.12*" and "find -name kernel-source-2.4.12*" issued
> from /
> This despite following all of the suggested commands from this list and
> others to
> cause it to be created (e.g. "tar -xvvzf linux-2.4.12.tar.gz") from docs or
> man or
> whatever resource I found that.
> 
> Somewhere folks are assuming that I am taking a step that they have not
> explicitly stated and thus the creation of the critical kernel-source in the
> necessary format in the necessary location is not happening.
> 
> As always I have perused man, docs, help, articles and posts, and every
> other
> online resource I can find.  All assume things not explicitly stated or use
> terminology I do not as-of-yet understand fully.
> 
> Help?
> 
> Thanks!  Doc
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 



Reply to: