Re: framebuffer
- To: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: framebuffer
- From: Andy Bastien <lists@yuggoth.net>
- Date: 11 Oct 2001 08:08:12 -0400
- Message-id: <1002802093.1914.12.camel@dagon>
- In-reply-to: <20011010230013.A511@swordfish>
- References: <20011010230013.A511@swordfish>
You'll probably have more luck with the SVGA driver. I don't know which
winmodem is in your particular laptop, but it might work; you can find a
listing of the ones that do at http://www.linmodems.org . The few
laptops that run Linux where I have had the opportunity to check what
they claimed their refresh rates to be have claimed to run at a vertical
refresh of 60 Hz, so the timings that come with the default X
configurations should work for standard resolutions. You're right that
they don't have an electron beam and don't use the timings in the same
way as a CRT; I don't know if they just ignore the refresh rate or if
they use it to synchronize with the graphics card in some manner.
On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 17:00, Gabor Nagy wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Do anyone use framebuffer on something like this:
> ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage P/M Mobility AGP 2x (rev 64)
> This is a Compaq Armada M700, if maybe someone else has the same (what
> about the built-in winmodem then?)
>
> The ati mach64 fb driver starts happily with this card, but all I got
> was the whole panel going white.
>
> I could log in (without seeing a thing) changed the videomodes with
> fbset, but couldn't get a barely readable output.
>
> Do you know anything about possible differences between a CRT and an LCD
> display timings? I suspect I wouldn't need all that information related
> to an electron beam.
>
> Regards
> Gee
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: