Re: lie to apt
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:37:29AM +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> unrouteable mail domain "22.214.171.124"
Sorry, that's why there's > at the beginning of each line. Also, I finally
found dh_make. Seems to be the easiest way to build a deb from non-debian source.
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 08:23:58AM -0800, Heather wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:13:23AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > Is there a way to manually edit the database that says which packages
> > > > are installed? I set up a small system, using potato, and am adding
> > > > several packages from source.
> > alien can turn tgz's into really wimpy debs. or you could build a real
> > deb file.
> > Jacob, let us know if alien does it for you :>
> This method seems to be both sufficient and efficient for what I want.
> It seems to work easily with stow, because I usually build with a
> prefix=/usr/local/stow/$packagename, so everything installs in a nice
> easy to tar directory.
> jakemsr:~/my_pkg$ tar czvf apache-1.3.17.tgz /usr/local/stow/apache
> jakemsr:~/my_pkg$ sudo rm -rf /usr/local/stow/apache
> jakemsr:~/my_pkg$ sudo alien apache-1.3.17.tgz
> alien output, mostly it can't find dependencies for libmysqlclient??
> I have php-4.0.4lp1 module with mysql-3.23.33 support. Probably
> can't find the libs because I haven't deb'd them yet.
> In any case it succeeded
> jakemsr:~/my_pkg$ sudo dpkg -i apache-1.3.17-1.1.deb
> .. success ..
> The only downpoint is that everything is installed in /usr/local/stow/apache,
> so for new packages, you still need to stow them to be of real use.
> To solve this, configure for a "fake root". Use something like
> ./configure --prexif=/usr/local/altroot/usr/local, then make the tarball like
> jakemsr:/usr/local/altroot$ tar czvf apache-1.3.17.tgz *.
> Then the deb will install into /usr/local. In both cases, apt
> and dpkg operated as expected on the deb. Mmmmm..... ALIEN.
> I'm going to clean out /usr/local and try building everything with
> the fake root method. I'll post my findings prob Sat afternoon.
> > There is a "hello" package which is really an example of packing a deb.
> > So, you could craft a really cheap package which contained your binaries;
> > you could probably use something like GUItar (a gtk app for making backups
> > which claims to have a file manager type interface ... mc won't work, I've
> > tried that) to actually fill it up with carefully crafted pieces.
> > It's extra trouble but you could set up a 'debianized' build environmant
> > and then build debs the "normal" way - that would get you both binary and
> > source debs if you want them. And if following instructions aimed at
> > developers is easy for you, probably the easier way. (But maybe not easier
> > than alien)
> I started doing this, and if the package is debian aware, it's actually
> rather easy. I don't really have much desire to be a Debian maintainer,
> so after a while of reading and not finding a simplified way of creating
> the control files, I gave up.
> > > > I added stuff like glib-1.2.8, tcl-8.32,
> > > > tk8.3.2, etc. How can I tell apt that these packages are installed?
> > > > Or at least make it think the potato version is installed.
> > Well, you *could* really install the potato version, then apply your own
> > redirections on them. That's handled in /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives and if
> > you install lynx-ssl there is a really nice example of it replacing lynx
> > (because you might, for some reason, want to use the lynx without ssl.)
> > I use this trick to redirect the SVGA server when I'm replacing it with
> > some vendor's hacked version to make their card work... because it's really
> > annoying to forget that you replaced it and have your card not work anymore
> > when you take the plunge and upgrade. And if the upgrade *claims* it now
> > covers your card - you still get the new one to try, so you can run it
> > explicitly.
> My HD is 4.5G and has win on it also, it also seems sloppy to have old binaries
> around that I don't have any need for. And like you said, an update would
> point things back at /usr.
> > > You may want to take a close(r) look at apt-cache. I have no idea if I'm
> > > correct, or if so, how to use it in this method, but it seems like the
> > > right tool for the job...
> > I thought apt-cache was for keeping a batch of debs so a bunch of machines
> > can share them? Anyways I just did an apt-get update and I don't even see
> > apt-cache in there.
> I used 'apt-cache search tk8' to find the packages that were part of the Tk
> distribution. It's basically a list of all debs your system knows about,
> either installed or available.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org