Re: Best Laptop?
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 08:32:31PM -0800, Heather wrote:
> > > As far as I can tell, anyway. It requires specialised drivers under
> > > Win32, fails to expose itself as a serial port and has the right sort of
> > > PCI specs to be a software modem.
> Actually, under Windows there will -always- be a driver ... but with a true
> modem, it will be only a couple K, enough to declare the device's name and
> link up to the serial port, basically. The others will have a driver that's
> quite large, perhaps 47k or worse.
Hmmm. what'd be the likely name for this sucker?
> > > Not that I will object if you can point me at how to enable it as a real
> > > modem under Linux. :)
> > I can't get it to go under linux. :/ lspci gives mention of a uart in
> > there but setserial don't give me any results. :/
> what, exactly, does LSPCI report for it?
00:0d.1 Serial controller: Xircom: Unknown device 00d3 (prog-if 02 )
Subsystem: Intel Corporation: Unknown device 2411
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10
Region 0: I/O ports at 1470
Region 1: Memory at e8003000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=2 PME-
it does not appear in /proc/interrupts, ioports or devices though. my 1
real serial port does appear in ioports devices but not interrupts.
the ethernet side of the minipci card goes it works just fine.
'We do more then just sing and dance. We've got a brain too.'
-- The Backstreet Boys