Re: Duda con cross-certified

To: Manuel Venturi Porras Peralta <venturi@openmailbox.org>
Cc: debian-es <debian-l10n-spanish@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Duda con cross-certified
From: Matías Bellone <matiasbellone+debian@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:37:08 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] CANk6MLY0qF2qzrx7VYuLr_iVV4quAPD6ZhJJavAXwNvSPq5_Yw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5624F078.7070008@openmailbox.org>
References: <[🔎] 5624F078.7070008@openmailbox.org>

Yo lo traduciría como:

la sub-llave para firmar %s ya pasó el proceso de certificación cruzada

2015-10-19 10:30 GMT-03:00 Manuel "Venturi" Porras Peralta <venturi@openmailbox.org>:

signing subkey %s is already cross-certified

Duda existencial para mejorar la traducción de gnupg, cómo traducís
vosotros cross-certified en este contexto? Certificado cotejado, en este
contexto, certificada y cotejada?

Gracias a los que respondan :)

--
Free Software Foundation Associate Member #9537
Manuel "Venturi" Porras Peralta
venturi@member.fsf.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Duda con cross-certified
  - From: "Manuel \"Venturi\" Porras Peralta" <venturi@openmailbox.org>

References:
- Duda con cross-certified
  - From: "Manuel \"Venturi\" Porras Peralta" <venturi@openmailbox.org>

Prev by Date: Duda con cross-certified
Next by Date: Re: Duda con cross-certified
Previous by thread: Duda con cross-certified
Next by thread: Re: Duda con cross-certified
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread