[DONE] wml://security/2018/dsa-410{6,7}.wml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- --- english/security/2018/dsa-4106.wml 2018-02-08 00:13:09.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2018/dsa-4106.wml 2018-02-08 08:46:19.514205412 +0500
@@ -1,17 +1,19 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
<define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Two vulnerabilities were discovered in Libtasn1, a library to manage
- -ASN.1 structures, allowing a remote attacker to cause a denial of
- -service against an application using the Libtasn1 library.</p>
+<p>Ð? Libtasn1, библиоÑ?еке длÑ? Ñ?абоÑ?Ñ? Ñ?о Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?кÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ами ASN.1, бÑ?ли
+обнаÑ?Ñ?женÑ? две Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?и, позволÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ие Ñ?далÑ?нномÑ? злоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленникÑ? вÑ?зÑ?ваÑ?Ñ?
+оÑ?каз в обÑ?лÑ?живании в пÑ?иложении, иÑ?полÑ?зÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ем библиоÑ?екÑ? Libtasn1.</p>
- -<p>For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
- -version 4.10-1.1+deb9u1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (stretch) Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 4.10-1.1+deb9u1.</p>
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your libtasn1-6 packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? libtasn1-6.</p>
- -<p>For the detailed security status of libtasn1-6 please refer to its
- -security tracker page at:
- -<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libtasn1-6";>https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libtasn1-6</a></p>
+<p>С подÑ?обнÑ?м Ñ?Ñ?аÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ом поддеÑ?жки безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и libtasn1-6 можно ознакомиÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? на
+Ñ?ооÑ?веÑ?Ñ?Ñ?вÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ей Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?аниÑ?е оÑ?Ñ?леживаниÑ? безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и по адÑ?еÑ?Ñ?
+<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libtasn1-6";>\
+https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libtasn1-6</a></p>
</define-tag>
# do not modify the following line
- --- english/security/2018/dsa-4107.wml 2018-02-08 03:07:26.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2018/dsa-4107.wml 2018-02-08 08:50:00.640590196 +0500
@@ -1,18 +1,20 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
<define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>It was discovered that the webhook validation of Anymail, a Django email
- -backends for multiple ESPs, is prone to a timing attack. A remote
- -attacker can take advantage of this flaw to obtain a
- -WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION secret and post arbitrary email tracking events.</p>
+<p>Ð?Ñ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено, Ñ?Ñ?о пÑ?овеÑ?ка webhook в Anymail, Django-движкаÑ? Ñ?лекÑ?Ñ?онной
+поÑ?Ñ?Ñ? длÑ? Ñ?азлиÑ?нÑ?Ñ? ESP, Ñ?Ñ?звима к аÑ?акам по Ñ?аймингам. УдалÑ?ннÑ?й злоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленник
+можеÑ? иÑ?полÑ?зоваÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?Ñ? длÑ? полÑ?Ñ?ениÑ? закÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ой инÑ?оÑ?маÑ?ии из
+WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION и Ñ?озданиÑ? пÑ?оизволÑ?нÑ?Ñ? оÑ?Ñ?леживаÑ?Ñ?иÑ? Ñ?обÑ?Ñ?ий поÑ?Ñ?ового Ñ?Ñ?ика.</p>
- -<p>For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 0.8-2+deb9u1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (stretch) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 0.8-2+deb9u1.</p>
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your django-anymail packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? django-anymail.</p>
- -<p>For the detailed security status of django-anymail please refer to its
- -security tracker page at:
- -<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/django-anymail";>https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/django-anymail</a></p>
+<p>С подÑ?обнÑ?м Ñ?Ñ?аÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ом поддеÑ?жки безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и django-anymail можно ознакомиÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? на
+Ñ?ооÑ?веÑ?Ñ?Ñ?вÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ей Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?аниÑ?е оÑ?Ñ?леживаниÑ? безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и по адÑ?еÑ?Ñ?
+<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/django-anymail";>\
+https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/django-anymail</a></p>
</define-tag>
# do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rGoV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: