[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[DONE] wml://{security/2016/dsa-3630.wml}



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- --- english/security/2016/dsa-3630.wml	2016-07-27 01:16:55.000000000 +0500
+++ russian/security/2016/dsa-3630.wml	2016-07-27 09:46:46.049410043 +0500
@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
- -<define-tag description>security update</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.1" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>обновление безопаÑ?ноÑ?Ñ?и</define-tag>
 <define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Secunia Research at Flexera Software discovered an integer overflow
- -vulnerability within the _gdContributionsAlloc() function in libgd2, a
- -library for programmatic graphics creation and manipulation. A remote
- -attacker can take advantage of this flaw to cause a denial-of-service
- -against an application using the libgd2 library.</p>
+<p>СоÑ?Ñ?Ñ?дники Secunia Research из Flexera Software обнаÑ?Ñ?жили пеÑ?еполнение Ñ?елÑ?Ñ?
+Ñ?иÑ?ел в Ñ?Ñ?нкÑ?ии _gdContributionsAlloc() в libgd2, библиоÑ?еке
+длÑ? Ñ?озданиÑ? и Ñ?абоÑ?Ñ? Ñ? пÑ?огÑ?аммиÑ?Ñ?емой гÑ?аÑ?икой. УдалÑ?ннÑ?й
+злоÑ?мÑ?Ñ?ленник можеÑ? иÑ?полÑ?зоваÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?Ñ? длÑ? вÑ?зова оÑ?каза в обÑ?лÑ?живании
+в пÑ?иложении, иÑ?полÑ?зÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ем библиоÑ?екÑ? libgd2.</p>
 
- -<p>For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 2.1.0-5+deb8u6.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (jessie) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 2.1.0-5+deb8u6.</p>
 
- -<p>For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 2.2.2-43-g22cba39-1.</p>
+<p>Ð? неÑ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (sid) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 2.2.2-43-g22cba39-1.</p>
 
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your libgd2 packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? libgd2.</p>
 </define-tag>
 
 # do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=60cG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: