[DONE] wml://security/2011/dsa-2{244,348,370}.wml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- --- english/security/2011/dsa-2244.wml 2014-04-30 13:16:24.000000000 +0600
+++ russian/security/2011/dsa-2244.wml 2016-07-09 17:46:50.846378412 +0500
@@ -1,24 +1,25 @@
- -<define-tag description>incorrect boundary condition</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.2" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>некоÑ?Ñ?екÑ?ное погÑ?аниÑ?ное Ñ?оÑ?Ñ?оÑ?ние</define-tag>
<define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>It was discovered that BIND, an implementation of the DNS protocol,
- -does not correctly process certain large RRSIG record sets in DNSSEC
- -responses. The resulting assertion failure causes the name server
- -process to crash, making name resolution unavailable. (<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-1910";>CVE-2011-1910</a>)</p>
+<p>Ð?Ñ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено, Ñ?Ñ?о BIND, Ñ?еализаÑ?иÑ? пÑ?оÑ?окола DNS,
+непÑ?авилÑ?но обÑ?абаÑ?Ñ?ваеÑ? опÑ?еделÑ?ннÑ?е болÑ?Ñ?ие набоÑ?Ñ? запиÑ?ей RRSIG в оÑ?веÑ?аÑ?
+DNSSEC. Ð?озникаÑ?Ñ?аÑ? пÑ?и Ñ?Ñ?о оÑ?ибка Ñ?Ñ?веÑ?ждениÑ? пÑ?иводиÑ? к аваÑ?ийной оÑ?Ñ?ановке
+Ñ?еÑ?веÑ?а имÑ?н, Ñ?Ñ?о делаеÑ? Ñ?азÑ?еÑ?ение имÑ?н недоÑ?Ñ?Ñ?пнÑ?м. (<a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-1910";>CVE-2011-1910</a>)</p>
- -<p>In addition, this update fixes handling of certain signed/unsigned
- -zone combinations when a DLV service is used. Previously, data from
- -certain affected zones could become unavailable from the resolver.</p>
+<p>Ð?Ñ?оме Ñ?ого, данное обновление иÑ?пÑ?авлÑ?еÑ? обÑ?абоÑ?кÑ? опÑ?еделÑ?ннÑ?Ñ? подпиÑ?аннÑ?Ñ?/неподпиÑ?аннÑ?Ñ?
+комбинаÑ?ий зон пÑ?и иÑ?полÑ?зовании Ñ?лÑ?жбÑ? DLV. Ранее данне из
+опÑ?еделÑ?ннÑ?Ñ? зон Ñ?Ñ?ановилиÑ?Ñ? недоÑ?Ñ?Ñ?пнÑ? из Ñ?еÑ?аÑ?елÑ?.</p>
- -<p>For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 1:9.6.ESV.R4+dfsg-0+lenny2.</p>
+<p>Ð? пÑ?едÑ?дÑ?Ñ?ем Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (lenny) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1:9.6.ESV.R4+dfsg-0+lenny2.</p>
- -<p>For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (squeeze) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2.</p>
- -<p>The testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution (sid)
- -will be fixed soon.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?еÑ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?емом (wheezy) и неÑ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном (sid) вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?каÑ?
+Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?деÑ? иÑ?пÑ?авлена позже.</p>
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your bind9 packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? bind9.</p>
</define-tag>
# do not modify the following line
- --- english/security/2011/dsa-2348.wml 2014-04-30 13:16:25.000000000 +0600
+++ russian/security/2011/dsa-2348.wml 2016-07-09 17:49:48.881996550 +0500
@@ -1,34 +1,35 @@
- -<define-tag description>several vulnerabilities</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.2" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>неÑ?колÑ?ко Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?ей</define-tag>
<define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>Several vulnerabilities were discovered in SystemTap, an instrumentation
- -system for Linux:</p>
+<p>Ð? SystemTap, Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?еме конÑ?Ñ?олÑ? длÑ? Linux, бÑ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено
+неÑ?колÑ?ко Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?ей:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2503";>CVE-2011-2503</a>
- - <p>It was discovered that a race condition in staprun could lead to
- - privilege escalation. </p></li>
+ <p>Ð?Ñ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено, Ñ?Ñ?о Ñ?оÑ?Ñ?оÑ?ние гонки в staprun можеÑ? пÑ?иводиÑ?Ñ? к
+ повÑ?Ñ?ениÑ? пÑ?ивилегий.</p></li>
<li><a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4170";>CVE-2010-4170</a>
- - <p>It was discovered that insufficient validation of environment
- - variables in staprun could lead to privilege escalation.</p></li>
+ <p>Ð?Ñ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено, Ñ?Ñ?о недоÑ?Ñ?аÑ?оÑ?наÑ? пÑ?овеÑ?ка пеÑ?еменнÑ?Ñ? окÑ?Ñ?жениÑ?
+ в staprun можеÑ? пÑ?иводиÑ?Ñ? к повÑ?Ñ?ениÑ? пÑ?ивилегий.</p></li>
<li><a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4171";>CVE-2010-4171</a>
- - <p>It was discovered that insufficient validation of module unloading
- - could lead to denial of service. </p></li>
+ <p>Ð?Ñ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено, Ñ?Ñ?о недоÑ?Ñ?аÑ?оÑ?наÑ? пÑ?овеÑ?ка вÑ?гÑ?Ñ?зки модÑ?лÑ?
+ можеÑ? пÑ?иводиÑ?Ñ? к оÑ?казÑ? в обÑ?лÑ?живании. </p></li>
</ul>
- -<p>For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 1.2-5+squeeze1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (squeeze) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.2-5+squeeze1.</p>
- -<p>For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
- -version 1.6-1.</p>
+<p>Ð? неÑ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (sid) Ñ?Ñ?а пÑ?облема бÑ?ла иÑ?пÑ?авлена в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.6-1.</p>
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your systemtap packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? systemtap.</p>
</define-tag>
# do not modify the following line
- --- english/security/2011/dsa-2370.wml 2014-04-30 13:16:26.000000000 +0600
+++ russian/security/2011/dsa-2370.wml 2016-07-09 17:52:54.914288885 +0500
@@ -1,33 +1,34 @@
- -<define-tag description>several vulnerabilities</define-tag>
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.2" maintainer="Lev Lamberov"
+<define-tag description>неÑ?колÑ?ко Ñ?Ñ?звимоÑ?Ñ?ей</define-tag>
<define-tag moreinfo>
- -<p>It was discovered that Unbound, a recursive DNS resolver, would crash
- -when processing certain malformed DNS responses from authoritative DNS
- -servers, leading to denial of service.</p>
+<p>Ð?Ñ?ло обнаÑ?Ñ?жено, Ñ?Ñ?о Unbound, Ñ?екÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ивнÑ?й Ñ?еÑ?аÑ?елÑ? DNS, можеÑ? аваÑ?ийно
+завеÑ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ? Ñ?абоÑ?Ñ? пÑ?и обÑ?абоÑ?Ñ?е опÑ?еделÑ?ннÑ?Ñ? Ñ?пеÑ?иалÑ?но Ñ?Ñ?оÑ?миÑ?ованнÑ?Ñ? оÑ?веÑ?ов DNS оÑ?
+авÑ?оÑ?иÑ?еÑ?нÑ?Ñ? DNS-Ñ?еÑ?веÑ?ов, Ñ?Ñ?о пÑ?иводиÑ? к оÑ?казÑ? в обÑ?лÑ?живании.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-4528";>CVE-2011-4528</a>
- - <p>Unbound attempts to free unallocated memory during processing
- - of duplicate CNAME records in a signed zone.</p></li>
+ <p>Unbound пÑ?Ñ?аеÑ?Ñ?Ñ? оÑ?вободиÑ?Ñ? невÑ?деленнÑ?Ñ? облаÑ?Ñ?Ñ? памÑ?Ñ?и во вÑ?емÑ? обÑ?абоÑ?ки
+ дÑ?блиÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?иÑ? запиÑ?ей CNAME в подпиÑ?анной зоне.</p></li>
<li><a href="https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-4869";>CVE-2011-4869</a>
- - <p>Unbound does not properly process malformed responses which
- - lack expected NSEC3 records.</p></li>
+ <p>Unbound непÑ?авилÑ?но обÑ?абаÑ?Ñ?ваеÑ? некоÑ?Ñ?екÑ?нÑ?е оÑ?веÑ?Ñ?, в коÑ?оÑ?Ñ?Ñ?
+ оÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?вÑ?Ñ?Ñ? запиÑ?и NSEC3.</p></li>
</ul>
- -<p>For the oldstable distribution (lenny), these problems have been fixed in
- -version 1.4.6-1~lenny2.</p>
+<p>Ð? пÑ?едÑ?дÑ?Ñ?ем Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (lenny) Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.4.6-1~lenny2.</p>
- -<p>For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
- -version 1.4.6-1+squeeze2.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?ке (squeeze) Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в
+веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.4.6-1+squeeze2.</p>
- -<p>For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution
- -(sid), these problems have been fixed in version 1.4.14-1.</p>
+<p>Ð? Ñ?еÑ?Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?емом (wheezy) и неÑ?Ñ?абилÑ?ном (sid) вÑ?пÑ?Ñ?каÑ?
+Ñ?Ñ?и пÑ?облемÑ? бÑ?ли иÑ?пÑ?авленÑ? в веÑ?Ñ?ии 1.4.14-1.</p>
- -<p>We recommend that you upgrade your unbound packages.</p>
+<p>РекомендÑ?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? обновиÑ?Ñ? пакеÑ?Ñ? unbound.</p>
</define-tag>
# do not modify the following line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=tVFw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: