Re: debian-installer: Please update debian-installer sublevel 2 (and 3-5) translations
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07-06-2010 03:00, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hello Felipe and Brazilian translators,
>
> pt_BR translations of Debian Installer are slightly incomplete:
>
> Charset is UTF-8. Stats: sublevel1/pt_BR.po: 525 translated messages.
> Charset is UTF-8. Stats: sublevel2/pt_BR.po: 511 translated messages, 5 fuzzy translations, 11 untranslated messages.
> Charset is UTF-8. Stats: sublevel3/pt_BR.po: 438 translated messages, 34 fuzzy translations, 6 untranslated messages.
> Charset is UTF-8. Stats: sublevel4/pt_BR.po: 138 translated messages, 3 fuzzy translations.
> Charset is UTF-8. Stats: sublevel5/pt_BR.po: 124 translated messages, 10 fuzzy translations, 1 untranslated message.
>
> Felipe updated sublevel 1 recently, but completing other sublevels
> would be good....and technically required, at least for sublevel 2, if
> we want to keep pt_BR active in D-I.
>
> I know that the current D-I release manager (Otavio Salvador!) won't
> let this happen...:-)...but could you consider recompleting all this
> so that I can move my radar to another language while thinking "OK,
> pt_BR is now in good shape".
>
> You guys will have plenty of time for doing this during June as your
> country will nearly be inactive because of Futebol World Cup, right?
> (the most boring event of 2010, isn't it?)
>
> Many thanks in advance....
I'm slowly working thru the sublevels since I
finished 1. Work for 2 and 3 is on the way, hopefully
will hit subversion by the weekend, I'm also taking the
chance to review the entire PO to get it in sync with
our new orthographic rules.
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkwQg6YACgkQCjAO0JDlykZweACghu0oK5+f5Xi/19y9xbN2vNCx
4hkAnjJkLyxTy6l44D6xrUadYIcMAwEF
=DXkB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: