[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Intent to NMU openldap2.3 to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/08/2007 11:38 PM, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> On 03/08/2007 11:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <felipe@cathedrallabs.org> writes:
> 
>>> 	I have a small doubt, checking the internation website for
>>> references of old POs (I did not use them just checked the strings
>>> translated there), I found out two openldap packages that are not
>>> up-to-date in pt_BR, the attached pt_BR (grabbed from Christian's
>>> tarball) will solve that? Or should I update other files somewhere
>>> else? pt_BR team would like to go 100% with openldap. ;)
>>> http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/pt_BR
>>>   openldap2	 0% (0t;1f;37u)	pt_BR.po	André Luís Lopes
>>>   openldap2.3	8% (4t;12f;33u)	pt_BR.po	André Luís Lopes
>> openldap2 is a different source package and I don't know the details of
>> how it's maintained.  At the least, I have not updated it and don't know
>> the process for doing so.
> 
> 	Indeed. Christian sent a request for update for openldap2,
> so I guess I would need to update that po too. :-)

	Hmm... I spoke too fast, the call for update is also for
openldap2.3, I'm a little bit lost right now, I will reply to the
other message of Christian and wait for his information and
directions, if you could please wait until we solve that before
the next upload, I would be very thankful. Sorry for this.


	Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF8Ml2CjAO0JDlykYRAl/TAJ4ojf9ra7S5xW2ja5uxI1uSEJFC6gCfYAyr
p3siFyZwHadUIv6XhFdHEyE=
=nc60
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: