Re: dselect 1.17.22: Please update the PO translation for the package dselect

[Łukasz <BartekChom@poczta.onet.pl>]

I am sending this message to the list again. It seems that it did not 
arrive. Now the attachment is compressed.

Hi!

W dniu 30.11.2014 o 17:46, Guillem Jover pisze:
> The translations for:
>
> msgid "Avail.arch"
> msgid "Inst.arch"
>
> are the same as the ones for:
>
> msgid "Avail.ver"
> msgid "Inst.ver"
>
> I think they miss mentioning that they are related to version and
> architecture?
Yes. They miss it. Is it acceptable? Only now I have found corresponding
place in program and in source code and I still think that this is most
clear of possible solution.

Does any Polish user have other opinion? With this distinction this
could be in turn:
"dostęp.arch"
"zainst.arch"
"dostęp.wer"
"zainst.wer"
Maybe even as "zainst.arc" (10-character limit for architecture fields
(and 11-character limit for version fields)) this would be clear. And is 
"dostęp.arc" or "dost.arch" better?

I attach translation again. I am afraid that it did not go to the
discussion list.

Best regards,
Łukasz Dulny

Attachment: pl.po.gz
Description: application/gzip