Salut, Le 20/03/2012 11:38, Francois LANKAR a écrit : > passage en LCFC. En fait on va plutôt repasser en mise à jour : en pièce jointe les dernières modifications effectuées dans la version original : quelques paragraphes ajoutés. Par avance merci pour ta mise à jour de la traduction. Amicalement David
Index: english/vote/2012/platforms/algernon.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/vote/2012/platforms/algernon.wml,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.4 --- english/vote/2012/platforms/algernon.wml 11 Mar 2012 01:54:59 -0000 1.2 +++ english/vote/2012/platforms/algernon.wml 20 Mar 2012 21:53:48 -0000 1.4 @@ -206,3 +206,81 @@ <a href="$(HOME)/vote/2004/platforms/algernon">last time</a>, I'm playing to win, despite the perhaps unusual format of this platform. </p> + +<h1 id="reflections">Reflections</h1> +<p> +As is custom, in this section, I would like to speak a few words about the +platforms this year - about Zack's and Wouter's and my own too. +</p> +<h2 id="stefano-zacchiroli">Stefano Zacchiroli</h2> +<p> +Zack's platform is... interesting. On one hand, it's a clear and well done +platform, with specific plans listed and ways to achieve them. +</p> +<p> +On the other hand, looking at the two bullet points in the preamble, the +highest priority goal seems to be ensuring that there is a smooth transition to +a new DPL next year, and that he can finish the pending projects he's been +guiding the past two years. +</p> +<p> +Both goals are commendable, and the pending projects will need to be brought to +completion aswell. However, I could imagine a better scenario to achieve all +these goals than reelecting Stefano: change the DPL now, and delegate Stefano +to guide his projects to completion: he's obviously the most appropriate person +to do that, giving him a free hand would be a smart move in my opinion. +</p> +<p> +This way, Zack can see the pending projects brought to completion, take a huge +load of work off the shoulders of the DPL (and with this, easing the +transition), and time permitting, even work together with the DPL to make the +transition even smoother. +</p> +<p> +Since his calls for volunteers to participate in DPL-ish tasks failed in the +past, I believe turning things around a bit, and letting someone else sit on +the throne and get his hands dirty, with the former DPL guiding his steps would +yield better results. +</p> + +<h2 id="wouter-verhelst">Wouter Verhelst</h2> +<p> +From reading Wouter's platform, I get the impression that we share similar +ideas, which is great, because that means all three candidates are pretty much +on the same page, give or take a few smaller differences. +</p> +<p> +However, there's something I miss from his platform, something I find hard to +pin-point... perhaps a lack of a Bigger Plan? Same thing I miss from Stefano's +platform. Perhaps it's not even in mine. +</p> +<p> +Nevertheless, I think a DPL should not only think within the constraints of a +one-year term, but have a vision that points past that. I don't see that in +Wouter's platform, and it certainly isn't in Zack's, either. +</p> + +<h2 id="gergely-nagy">Gergely Nagy</h2> +<p> +My own platform was - and still is - a bit of an experiment, and as such, +wasn't entirely clear, and had only a few answers to the "How?" +questions. +</p> +<p> +I believed that the hows do not necessarily belong to the platform, there's a +campaigning period to discuss and refine them. I wouldn't want to put +bullet-pointed plans into a static platform, that will be indexed and +searchable for years to come. I'd rather discuss the hows on a mailing list, +that's more interactive. Nevertheless, some generic ideas were part of my +platform, just not down to a bullet-pointed action plan. +</p> +<p> +Another thing I heard criticised - although the question wasn't raised publicly +yet - is that my platform gave the impression that we already have sufficient +packaging manpower. We don't. What I intended to imply, is that we have a +reasonable inflow of new contributors (though, that can, and certainly must be +improved) and new packages, that we're on a good track here. What we lack, is +coordinating that manpower we have, and concentrating it to areas where work is +still needed. This, in turn, fits into my desire of making people even more +passionate about what they do. +</p>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature