Re: Bug#747697: [LCFC] templates://debian-security-support/{debian-security-support.templat es}

[Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:26:42AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > The alternative of
> > |  Updated checklists are provided by new package versions.
> > is a bad idea since all packages have new versions, but the default
> > assumption in Debian is that they won't reach stable, and this doesn't
> > explicitly override that default.  How about something like:
> > 
> >    New versions updating the checklists included in the stable release
> >    will be provided via security updates.
> > 
> > But it would help if we had a cover term meaning "security updates in
> > the strict sense, LTS updates, and whatever other kinds are
> > appropriate".  Maybe "support updates"?  "Special updates"?  Maybe
> > even
> > 
> >    New versions of this package with updated checklists will be provided
> >    via standard and/or extended security support.
> 
> We should pick to that one. Moritz, short ACK oder NACK since this
> introduces the "extended" term instead of "LTS"?

Fine with me.

Cheers,
        Moritz