On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 17:24:10 +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: > Justin B Rye wrote: > > Now the big one. [...] > > Here's the second half of the proofreading sweep for upgrading.dbk > (if fantasy movies are allowed two-part finales these days, so am I). > I hope I'm successfully keeping track of the sections that have been > "commented out". > Applied, thanks. > I'm assuming that any time the text says "Squeeze/Wheezy" I should > just standardise it to "squeeze/wheezy", which seem to be the > renderings that &oldreleasename;/&releasename; substitute to. > I'm not exactly sure when to use &releasename; vs &Releasename;. I'm fine with the lowercase version. > I've made a couple of changes that verge on content-modifying: > > process. For example, this will happen in desktop systems when > -<command>gdm</command> is restarted. > +the display manager is restarted. > > (Since for a start gdm will be replaced during the upgrade.) > I also replaced "this will happen" with "this may happen" because normally the display manager should keep running... > - As of 2012, Kolab is in a major rewrite and may get shipped with a > + As of 2012, Kolab was in a major rewrite and may get shipped with a > > (To show we do know what year it is.) > > However, I haven't touched the somewhat cobbwebby references to > kernel-package and deborphan, which I raised concerns about even for > the Squeeze release. > I'll remove the kernel-package reference. > Finally, at the top of the "list of obsolete packages": > > <systemitem role="package">mysql-5.1</systemitem>, successor is > <systemitem role="package">mysql-5.5</systemitem>. > > I don't see any mysql-5.* packages anywhere in Debian. Are those > source-package names? Should it say "mysql-server-5.x"? Yes, they're source package names. I'm not sure that needs to change, it should be fairly clear what this is about for mysql users. Thanks, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature