[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#725851: [ITR] templates://fpc/{fp-compiler.templates.in}



On 10/14/13 06:58, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Paul Gevers (elbrus@debian.org):
>> [ By the way, isn't it explicitly ? ]
> 
> It is. I just prefer making it clear in that standard template. There
> are times where we could eventually be more pushy, mostly  during
> release freezes. As some maintainers know that I can be a bit pushy
> wrt these things.....I just prefer confirming them that this is not
> the case *here*...:-)

Sorry Christian, I don't mean to criticize (lots of smiley's here), but
from the point of view that this is about language I found it funny that
you have what I believe is a typo in your template: "explicitely". I and
my spelling checker might be wrong though, and I did understand the meaning.

Paul


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: