Re: Review request for apt-listbugs template po file
Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
>
> Wow, that's a major rewrite of part of the man page!
> Do you release it under the same license terms as apt-listbugs (GPLv2
> or later [1])?
Sure, this and any other material I contribute. Maybe I ought to have
some sort of default licensing statement in my mailheaders, if only I
could think of something clear and concise enough.
> I will think about it and I will probably fix it, sooner or later (but
> I don't know whether such a change is acceptable during a freeze... so
> maybe later).
A man page rewrite is enough to be getting on with; any changes in
behaviour (and don't forget the naming of the --stats option!) can
wait.
Which is the "fixed" state checking for, though - a tag or some other
feature? http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer doesn't say anything
about the "fixed" tag being obsolete - it just says that it replaces
"the old _fixed_ severity". And then again there's the server-control
command "fixed <bugnumber> <version>"...
Tentatively:
pending = default state
forwarded = marked as forwarded
pending-fixed = tagged as "pending"
(?) fixed = tagged as "fixed"
(?) absent = not found in this distribution/architecture
done = resolved in this distribution/architecture
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: