Re: kismet 2011.03.R2-1: Please review debconf PO/control for the package kismet
>>> Oh, I forgot to add my traditional Why The Name footnote. README
>>> §18 says: "I really just [...] clicked through a thesaurus until I
>>> found a word that wasn't used in any other OSS projects".
>> I understood nothing at all here, elaborate please :D
> Here on debian-l10n-english I occasionally suggest that package
> descriptions should mention the reason for the package's name (for
> instance if it's a non-obvious acronym). I've even produced a
> spin-off Wiki page: "http://wiki.debian.org/WhyTheName". According to
> the README, the answer in the case of Kismet is basically "why not?"
OK, I see!
So, we do not include why the name, right?
At this point, should I prepare the updated files and send them again
in the list?