Re: Bug#686260: [LCFC] templates://mathematica-fonts/{templates,control}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 06/09/2012 04:06, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>> I think the "licesne itself" should not be translated
Sure, that's already covered by the “#flag:translate!:3-5”: starting
with “WRI licenses Mathematica fonts to individual users [...]” until
the end is not translatable. The only part translatable for this last
screen boils down to “License for Mathematica fonts” and the following
paragraph “Read this agreement carefully before proceeding. It is an
agreement [...] below, you are accepting the terms of this agreement”.
If that paragraph shouldn't be translated either, we can tweak the
configuration too.
> I think po-debconf has a way of marking some lines as untranslatable.
> Could that or something like
>
> # TRANSLATORS: please include the untranslated license
> # in addition to your translation if you translate it.
No: it will only show up a comment in gettext PO files. As documented in
po-debconf(7), the debconf way to do that is using “#flag:comment:1” as
already existing in this file, but better directly not show up the
untranslatable text to translators as already set.
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=6lG4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: