Re: [RFR] templates://xfonts-traditional/{xfonts-traditional.templates}

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Christian PERRIER writes ("Re: [RFR] templates://xfonts-traditional/{xfonts-traditional.templates}"):
> This process was, as I explained, criticized by some maintainers
> because it wasn't using the BTS. So we switched to a second version
> where a bug report is opened at the beginning of the process....which
> is what I started a few days ago. As, apparently, that process wasn't
> fitting your expectations (I admit that the very original bug report
> *without* any proposal *yet* may sound strange but, as in 99% of
> packages, we always have something to propose, I think it's not that bad).

I think this needs to be discussed on -devel so that we can get
consensus about what the process should be.

Thanks,
Ian.