[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#644361: fcitx: Typos in package description



Aron Xu wrote:
>> While trying to torment it into an appropriate shape I've ended up
>> with this version instead:
>>
>> Description: Free Chinese Input Toy of X
>>  Fcitx is an Input Method framework providing a graphical interface for
>>  entering Chinese characters in a variety of applications and using a
>>  variety of mapping systems.
>>  .
> 
> Why again "entering Chinese characters"? I'm afraid we need rephrasing
> here in near future (month-ish).

Because it'll cover more languages?  In that case you might just be
able to change s/Chinese/CJK/.  Another approach would be to say "a
graphical interface to support [character input in] writing systems
such as Chinese [or...]".

>>  Despite its humble name and beginnings, it offers a pleasant and
>>  modern experience, with intuitive graphical configuration tools and
>>  customizable skins and mapping tables. It is highly modularized and
>>  extensible, with GTK and Qt front-ends, support for back-end UIs

I'd better doublecheck: does that phrase "back-end UIs" make sense?

>>  based on Fbterm, pure Xlib, GTK, or KDE, and a developer-friendly API.
>>  .
>>  This metapackage pulls in a set of components recommended for most
>>  desktop Fcitx users.
>>
>> (I'm probably garbling those features, too.  For instance, how much
>> else is there that you might configure besides the skins and tables?
> 
> The configuration is very detailed. Here is an incomplete list:
[...]

Then I definitely can't say just that it has "intuitive graphical
configuration tools for customizing skins and mapping tables" without 
summarizing its other configurable features; I'd be better off leaving
it as in the quoted version above.  Or of course it could be
"intuitive graphical configuration tools for customizing skins,
mapping tables, and many other features."
-- 
JBR	with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
	sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package


Reply to: