[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: request rewiev of vim-conqueterm package control file



Hello,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Justin B Rye <jbr@edlug.org.uk> wrote:
> harish badrinath wrote:
>> Source: conque
>> Section: editors
>> Priority: extra
>> Maintainer: Harish Badrinath <harishbadrinath@gmail.com>
>> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8)
>> Standards-Version: 3.9.1
>> Homepage: https://code.google.com/p/conque/
>>
>> Package: vim-conqueterm
>> Architecture: all
>> Depends: ${misc:Depends},vim-gtk,python
>> Recommends: vim-addon-manager
>> Description: This Vim-Plugin is used to run interactive commands inside a Vim buffer
>
> That's a full sentence - what the Developer's Reference recommends is
> something that you can slot into the template
>  The package <name> provides {a,an,the,some} <synopsis>.
> In other words, something more like:
>
>  Description: plugin for running interactive commands in a Vim buffer
>
>>  This package is a Vim Plugin which allows you to run interactive programs,
>>  such as bash on Linux or Powershell.exe on Windows, inside a vim buffer. In
>>  other words it is a terminal emulator which uses a Vim buffer to display the
>>  program output.
>
> This makes a good explanation for the upstream website, but in a
> Debian package description there's no point saying how you would use
> it on Windows; and come to that, since it's "Architecture: all" the
> "Linux" part applies to kFreeBSD too.  Let's just not mention
> operating systems at all.
>
> While I'm rephrasing it I'll standardise on capital-V "Vim", but
> that'll do:
>
>   This package provides a Vim plugin which allows interactive programs such
>   as Bash to be run inside a Vim buffer. In other words, it is a terminal
>   emulator which uses a Vim buffer to display the program output.

Thanks a lot. Yours sound a lot nicer.
Also some advice on, how to give you credit for your contribution
(in the copyright file ??). Can i license "the text" under MIT/ expat ??

Greetings,
Harish


Reply to: