Re: ports/powerpc/index.wml: squeeze release is not mentioned
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 20/05/2011 17:28, Holger Wansing a écrit :
> David Prévot <davidp@altern.org> wrote:
>> Le 20/05/2011 16:33, Holger Wansing a écrit :
>>> [CC'ing debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, please keep me in CC,
>>> as I'm not subscribed to that list]
>>
>>>> http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/
>>
>>>> In this list the squeeze release is not listed.
>>
>>> Do you want me to commit such patch?
>>>
>>> --- ports_powerpc_index-orig.wml 2011-05-20 22:25:28.000000000 +0200
>>> +++ ports_powerpc_index-workingcopy.wml 2011-05-20 22:27:01.000000000 +0200
>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>>> <p>
>>> Debian PowerPC port was first officially released with Debian GNU/Linux 2.2
>>> (`potato'). Support for PowerPC is continued in the releases 3.1 (`sarge'),
>>> - 4.0 (`etch') and 5.0 (`lenny').
>>> + 4.0 (`etch'), 5.0 (`lenny') and 6.0 (`squeeze').
>>> Please see the <a href="$(HOME)/releases/stable/powerpc/release-notes/">
>>> release notes</a> and <a href="$(HOME)/releases/stable/powerpc/">\
>>> installation manual</a> for more information.
>>
>> Why not instead use something that won't need further update on next
>> releases, as:
>>
>> Debian PowerPC port was first officially released with Debian
>> GNU/Linux 2.2 (`potato').
>> Support for PowerPC is continued since and is currently
>> available with Debian GNU/Linux <6.0 (`squeeze')>.
>>
>> where <6.0 (`squeeze')> would be automatically updated?
>
> That's what I wrote in my initial mail, too,
Indeed, so we already agree on this point ;-).
> but the proposal above
> does not include the same information as the old text. In the old
> text 3.0 is missing. So powerpc wasn't a release architecture for
> 3.0 ?
It was, according to the following links, so the new wording proposal
fixes this long standing issue too.
http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/
http://archive.debian.org/debian/dists/Debian-3.0/
> And: if you change to above proposal, and powerpc is dropped for 7.0,
> you have to change the text again (ok, it's probably most unlikely that
> powerpc gets dropped).
Well, we'll have to update the page and state that the support was
dropped in version X.0 (and I believe it would need to be stated
explicitly enough, so a rewording would be needed anyway). Until X.0 is
out, we could rest (which is not the case now).
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=oAjA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: