Re: [ITR] templates://rinputd/{templates}
Sounds good to me!
Thanks,
-- Chase
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainer,
>
> The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English
> localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf
> templates used in rinputd.
>
> This review takes place for all packages that use debconf to interact with
> users and its aims are:
> - to improve the use of English in all debconf templates;
> - to make the wording of debconf templates more consistent;
> - to encourage more translations of templates.
>
> Even if your first language is English, this process is likely to help
> track down typos or errors, and improve consistency between the
> debconf templates of your package and that of other packages in the
> distribution.
>
> The process involves both debian-l10n-english contributors and
> Debian translators.
>
> The details of the process are given in
> http://wiki.debian.org/I18n/SmithDebconfReviewProcess.
>
> I will act as the coordinator of this activity for rinputd.
>
> The first step of the process is to review the debconf source
> template file(s) of rinputd. This review will start on Wednesday, May 05, 2010, or
> as soon as you acknowledge this mail with an agreement for us to
> carry out this process.
>
> All parts of the process will be carried out in close collaboration
> with you, and, unless you explicitely ask for it, no upload nor NMU
> will happen for rinputd.
>
> If you approve this process, please let us know by replying to this
> mail. If some work in progress on your side would conflict with such a
> rewrite (such as adding or removing debconf templates), please say so,
> and we will defer the review to later in the development cycle.
>
> Thank you for your attention.
>
> --
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvdbXAACgkQ1OXtrMAUPS0tkACdHOF5wb3TXvhJyt4Pe53pnjfm
> coIAn159BovIxM5BM7zBQ9VTLSp1eibL
> =p3ZT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Reply to: