Re: [RFR] Description for package quassel
Hi Thomas,
A general thought I was reminded of:
Thomas Müller wrote:
> We should not go too far away from the upstream description by inventing new
> attributes.
I have started noticing this idea (such-and-such is a bad idea
because we should not diverge from upstream or have too many patches)
expressed by a wide variety of people, and I have to admit it baffles
me. Isn’t a package maintainer’s job to work together with upstream
to improve the software?
Jonathan
Reply to: