[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFR] templates://rpm/{rpm.templates}

Quoting Justin B Rye (jbr@edlug.org.uk):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Your review should be sent as an answer to this mail.
> >  Template: rpm/upgrade-failed
> [...]
> > -_Description: rpm database cleaned up
> > +_Description: Package information database for rpm cleaned up
> An easier way of avoiding initial lowercase:
>    _Description: RPM database cleaned out
> ("Cleaned out" seems a more alarmingly accurate description.  Is
> there some better word I'm not seeing?)

I hesitated going that way, but I noticed that the original package
clearly makes a difference between "rpm" (the software) and RPM (the
package format).

Here, the database is the database for the software, so not using
uppercase makes sense.

Changes to debian/control inegrated...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: