[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFR] templates://apt-cacher-ng/{apt-cacher-ng.templates}

Quoting Jonathan Wiltshire (debian@jwiltshire.org.uk):

> The description was far too long. This brevity turns it into a much more
> elegant question
> + If enabled, apt-cacher-ng will request packages from a mirror of your
> + choosing, instead of the one requested by the client. If disabled, the
> + client's request will be respected.
> + .
> + You can choose how this feature should behave in the next step.

I'm not fond of constructions that make assumptions on the way things
will be presented. So the "in the next step" should IMHO be dropped
(for instance, the answer to that question could be preseeded and
there will be no next step, indeed).

I'd propose to just drop the second paragraph.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: