Quoting Jonathan Wiltshire (email@example.com): > The description was far too long. This brevity turns it into a much more > elegant question > > + If enabled, apt-cacher-ng will request packages from a mirror of your > + choosing, instead of the one requested by the client. If disabled, the > + client's request will be respected. > + . > + You can choose how this feature should behave in the next step. I'm not fond of constructions that make assumptions on the way things will be presented. So the "in the next step" should IMHO be dropped (for instance, the answer to that question could be preseeded and there will be no next step, indeed). I'd propose to just drop the second paragraph.
Description: Digital signature