Template into which the synopsis should fit (was: Request for review of a new package's description)
This is no longer anything to do with the specific package under
question; I have no more to add to Justin's comments on that topic.
Justin B Rye <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> As a rule of thumb, [the package synopsis] should be something that
> fits into the template
> the package $PACKAGE provides (a/the) $SYNOPSIS
Two points on this.
When did you start using “provides” (instead of “is”) in this template?
I think it's an improvement, but it's the first time I recall seeing it.
We need a name for this putative template. The synopsis should, we
assert, fit into this template, but what do we *call* that template for
ease of discussing it with others?
“The template into which the synopsis should fit” is the kind of
roundabout language up with which I will not put :-)
\ “Unix is an operating system, OS/2 is half an operating system, |
`\ Windows is a shell, and DOS is a boot partition virus.” —Peter |
_o__) H. Coffin |