Re: Request for review: fwknop package
Franck Joncourt wrote:
> libpcap, thus preventing any connections from being processed
> on the traditionnal port.
> What do you think ?
I can't quibble with that... except for the spelling:
s/traditionnal/traditional/. Oh, wait, you got that right below
>> Instead of "doing X; doing Y; doing Z", make that "doing X, doing Y,
>> and doing Z":
>> This is the client program responsible for accepting password input
>> from the user, constructing SPA packets that conform to the fwknop
>> packet format, and encrypting packet data.
> Is there a mistake with the last comma, or is it an English syntax ?
> "doing X, doing Y, and doing Z"
(Switching into linguistics-pedant mode: it's a mere notational
convention, not a matter of real English syntax!)
>>> behaviour by updating the START_DAEMON variable from "no" to "yes" in
> So which one should I use, since to me there is no difference at all :)
> In the same way, I used to use colour rather than color.
The debian-l10n-english standard for debconf templates and package
descriptions is en_US; as an en_GB-speaker I use "behaviour" myself,
but I also spell "authorization" with an S.
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package