[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#485562: twiki: configure script access badly protected



Le vendredi 27 juin 2008 à 19:22 +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> Quoting Olivier Berger (olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu):
> 
> > > I think that the twiki/apacheUserCreationNote becomes useless now.
> > > It is needed by the following bit of code:
> > > 
> > > # add info due to 3-4 bug reports
> > > db_input high twiki/apacheUserCreationNote || true
> > >
> > > 
> > > This is clear and blatant debconf abuse, I'm afraid. Interrupting
> > > installs to give information that should be in README.Debian
> > 
> > On this one point I agree, if policy recommends not doing so. Still,
> > note that it is only "high" and not "critical" in the db_input, in
> > config... So may not interrupt in all cases ?
> 
> Nearly all. "high" is the default priority for debconf so using a high
> priority note is likely to interrupt most installations.
> 

SNIP

> 
> Anyway, I leave it up to you to decide, with these arguments...:-)

I fully get your point, but I think this is a maintainer's decision, so
I propose to file a bug or wishlist on that issue, and leave it out of
the current NMU round. In any case, it's just about removing one
template (and corresponding config script instructions) so no much
impact on translator's work ;-)

And :

Le vendredi 27 juin 2008 à 19:29 +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> If you've settled on a last version from the exchanges with Justin
> (and my last comment about the debconf note where as I said, I leave
> it up to you to decide), then please post it here and then I'll sent
> the call for updates.
> 

I need some more testing on a settled version, and hopefully will say GO
in a couple hours.

Thanks for your caring for this package.

Best regards,

-- 
Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu>
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)


Reply to: